How often, before the industrial revolution, did families actually part by moving far from one another? I am thinking it was not a very common occurrence. A young man may have gone to the next town or region to start his own farm or business, though more often than not, children carried on the family farm/business. If they chose another business, they apprenticed to learn the new business. Many times that could be done very close to their family home. When a child married and began their own family even that did not separate their birth families. Rather, their leaving was (and is today) the starting of a fresh new branch on the great family tree. In the past this was usually done with the blessing and support of both families so that the new branch could grow strong as its own entity. But it still remain attached, living close by, its ‘new’ life intertwined with the family from whence they came. The new branch would forever be nourished through the root system established many generations earlier.
With the industrial revolution came the ability to travel to new places more easily and for more reasons. These new places offered many new choices of vocations. Many different ways to earn money and various living situations became more accessible to the masses. People began to leave their families behind for new and supposedly greater horizons. Many never returned to their roots, or their families. I will not follow this train of thought through history any longer. We know to which wonderful inventions the industrial revolution has led. Most people appreciate most of them.
But in the freedom of movement that we, at least we in the western world, are privileged with, something else has been attached. This freedom, so to speak, has caused given us the ability to be quite transient. We can move from one town to the next, from state to state, even cross the ocean to another country and back again, with barely a thought beyond cost of living, school districts, and who will pay for the move. And we can do all of it often in a lifetime. I contend that this transient nature of our society has not been without the attachment of great price. That price is the cohesive nature of family beyond the four walls wherein our ‘immediate’ family lives.
Family is much more than father, mother, children. Family is the heritage before that unit. It is the branches alongside that have grown with it from the great tree. A tree is not whole without all of its branches. When we keep pruning the branches and starting new trees so far from the elder, we end up with saplings that cannot very well withstand the storms of life. They do not have the support of the trunk whose very size is security itself, but also whose roots have gone so deep that little can disturb its presence or purpose. They cannot enjoy the peace that comes from being sheltered by each other’s leaves. The new leaves on the branches of these saplings often never truly know the great tree of their ancestry. And many of these saplings, because of their immature root system, their lack of natural support and protection, are chopped down or splintered into little pieces by the harsh machinery of life in a fallen world.
Here is an example in my life of how this transient society has affected me adversely. Three years ago, we nearly lost two of our daughters at the same time, in two unrelated incidents. It was a horrific time in our lives. Our next closest relatives are in
In 27 years of marriage, I have always been sad to live so far from my parents, my siblings, and their families. But I was also very unhappy to grow up living far from one set of grandparents because that grandfather was in the military and moved often. That sadness borne of the transient nature of our society continues today while one of my own daughters is married and lives 1200 miles away. And there is no telling where the other two will live once they settle down, or even if they settle down. They may move from town to town, state to state or even country to country and back again.
I believe that families are intended to grow old and strong together in order to weather life’s storms from their beginning to the end. Our transient society tends to make many decisions for us, but we do not have to let it destroy our family heritage. Instead, we can fight back constructively by staying in touch with our families. We can talk on the phone (not just text) and visit often, sharing not just life’s monuments but the little daily events as well. We can send photographs regularly, and even schedule family reunions every few years. All of these efforts will enable the leaves, branches, saplings and trees to have a chance to get to know the great ancestral family tree that they all sprang from. Because in the end, it is family that will always be there.
6 comments:
This is great, Cheryl! I've seen a lot of this happen in my life, although I must say that sometimes the distance has been helpful to family relationships.
I think you should seriously consider tweaking this a bit and submitting it to a family magazine!
Thank you, Allison. I think I will work on that and call the article, Transient Societies Need Not Be a Nemesis to Families, with more constructive tips on how to make sure we keep our ancestral roots alive and real for generations to come.
Hi Cheryl, I agree that we must work hard at maintaining those relationships that are important to us. Having studied pre-industrial cultures, I will note that the *means* to maintaining relationships were not so Idyllic either. Travel was difficult even within a few miles, it was a commitment for the day or week. This is still the case in small viallages in less industrialized regions like much of Central America. I can fly to Honduras faster than I can get from Las Vegas (the Honduran one) to Victoria. Letter writing was more personal, but less reliable than email. Of course telephones were not available, so tone of voice of correspondence was often misinterpreted.
In my life, I was able to fly from Baltimore to KC in the same time that it takes to drive from Saint Louis to KC--in order to visit my family and friends, and for no more $$. Telephone rates are much cheaper now. My parents rarely made a long-distance call--it was an event! Now it is routine for me and my generation. Crossing the *pond* use to take weeks, in good weather, now takes a few hours.
My point is we can use the post industrial revolution advances in travel and communication for good or it can further isolate us.
Your blog is an example of how we can share feelings and yet remain personal because your audience is likely the same as you would gather around your table if we were all in the same city.
Keep up the writing. I feel more like *family* every time I read a new post.
I found this interesting quote from a talk by the controversial Peter Phan. Regardless of his theological leanings, I thought his observation of American culture was similar to yours, Cheryl.
"“In America there are ‘mobile homes,’” he said incredulously. “That is an oxymoron. In Vietnam, home is roots, it is relationships, it is family. Home is the place where you are born, where you live and where you die. In America home goes 75 miles per hour down the interstate.”
He drew laughter recalling his first experience with McDonalds. “I saw a guy drive into a McDonalds and order his meal through a window,” he said. “He didn’t know who was cooking his food. And then the people put it in a brown paper bag like it was something to be ashamed of. Then he sat in the parking lot and ate it. This doesn’t ring true to a Vietnamese. A meal is a time for sitting down and sharing family stories.”" From a talk at Conception Abbey Alumni Day.
Peace,
Mike
Hey, Mike!
(Pre-Script: I was writing this but had not posted before I read Phan’s observation and insight, which you would know I totally agree with. Thanks for sharing it with us!)
Just because the technology to travel quickly from place to place is available does not mean we can all do so when we want/need to. It costs money. Which many do not have at their disposal. And time. Which many have less of because of those lovely time clocks. Do you have family in Honduras? That would be rare in the pre-IR days, anyway. And if they had actually moved that far away, you would have said goodbye to them, true, and assume you would not seem them again until we met on the other side. That would be sad. But it was rare to go as far as from America to Honduras.. If they were a week’s travel away, perhaps you would stay a few months. That was how people visited family. It likely was not an annual event for most households. That was one reason it was not suspect that Mary stayed so long with Elizabeth. It was quite a journey. Yes, in less industrialized nations travel is still quite burdensome. But the only reason they want to travel far and abroad is because they want to reach the industrialized world outside their borders.
If we, in our families, from generation to generation, all lived in the same town or region, though it may take a day or three by horse back to reach a family member in need, more people could do so. Some people think that perhaps the distance can actually help family relationships. Perhaps it can. There have always been families that had some difficulties in getting along. Look at Cain and Abel. But some might use distance as an excuse not to deal with some issues that actually could be dealt with if we had to.
I know there are innumerable benefits to our society since the industrial revolution. You know me – I’m lovin’ my cell phones and laptops and more, like advancements in science and medicine - but I’d give it all up in a heartbeat to be close to my parents when they are ill. Or to even have the opportunity to say I can or cannot make the family Sunday dinner this month or the 4th of July picnic this year would make my heart swell. To be able to celebrate my parents’ upcoming 59th wedding anniversary with them without having to spend however much in round trip airfare to Philadelphia and how many days just so I don’t exhaust myself with jet lag (and then explain how much time off at the Bean to Becca?), would mean more to me than any technological advances that have made ‘life easier.’
To me, family, and its roots, is life.
I like the concept of those who read and respond to my blog are like those whom I would invite to my dinner table. It is a beautiful picture. Thank you, Mike. And yes, Mike, you are family already. And those around our table, are always closer to being like family, too
Post a Comment